Strong Escalation Chains Keep Operational Problems From Becoming Background Noise

Credit: BambooHR

In the slow periods, that's when you focus on process improvement. You tighten things up, you build good habits, and these habits carry you into the busy period.

Laura Ilioaei

Operations Manager
Avis Budget Group

The most reliable operations aren’t defined by the newest tools or the most ambitious process-improvement initiatives. They run on strong standard operating procedures, clear escalation chains, and leaders who model what good execution looks like. In frontline environments where the pace never really slows, the work of improvement must happen during the quieter stretches so it can be executed under pressure during the busy ones. This means the teams that hold up best are the ones that built good habits when they had time to think rather than scrambling to invent them mid-rush.

Laura Ilioaei understands that rhythm intimately. As an Operations Manager at Avis Budget Group overseeing fleet operations at Sarasota Airport, Ilioaei built her management playbook directly on the floor. Her career has spanned frontline, fast-paced environments, including warehouse operations, helping launch a restaurant, and now fleet operations in the car rental industry. Across all three, she has managed teams under the kind of real-time pressure where a single dropped ball can cascade into an operational problem, which shapes her view of when and how improvement work actually gets done.

“In the slow periods, that’s when you focus on process improvement. You check what might have gotten lost in the busy period. You tighten things up, you build good habits, and these habits carry you into the busy period,” she says. Such a rhythm reframes process improvement as something you invest in deliberately, and places the emphasis on the systems and chain of command that keep problems from slipping through rather than on tools that promise to fix execution from the outside.

Slow periods sharpen, busy periods execute

The distinction Ilioaei draws is between two fundamentally different modes of operating. Slow periods are for reflection and refinement. Busy periods are for execution and real-time problem-solving, with no room to step back and redesign anything. “If you try to focus on that during a rush, you’ve created a real-time bottleneck. Why were you focused on process improvement when there was a fire to put out?”

The line between what can wait and what cannot comes down to whether an issue creates an immediate barrier to the operation. Some problems have to be solved the moment they appear because letting them sit creates cascading damage. “If an associate assigns the wrong vehicle to a customer, that’s an inventory nightmare you have to tackle in real time, because there’s a mismatch between what’s on the contract and what they actually have,” Ilioaei explains. 

The same logic applies to staffing gaps during peak demand, like being short-handed at the counter during the noon rush, and to quality problems from third parties, like vehicles arriving too dirty to rent. Those get addressed immediately because they directly block the operation. The deeper process questions wait for the slow season.

Improvement is usually execution, not redesign

One of the more useful distinctions Ilioaei makes is that strong SOPs change what improvement work actually involves. When the underlying procedures are sound, improvement is rarely about overhauling the process. Instead, it’s about tightening how consistently the team executes it. “Process improvement, in my opinion, is more about making sure the end result is what’s best for the customer,” she notes.

That framing depends on having strong procedures in the first place. Ilioaei credits well-established SOPs, proven out with third parties, counter agents, and return agents, for keeping most situations from escalating into serious operational issues. The fires that do happen tend to be the unavoidable kind, like a customer booking one vehicle class and getting another because the inventory isn’t there, rather than failures of the underlying system.

She’s also candid that middle managers operate within limits. Some problems sit above their level of access or authority, and part of operating well is recognizing which problems are yours to solve and which belong to someone higher up the chain.

Escalation chains keep problems from becoming noise

The mechanism Ilioaei keeps returning to, across all three industries she’s worked in, is the escalation chain. It’s what prevents issues from accumulating quietly until they become unmanageable. When a problem moves up the chain of command, it generates the urgency that forces action. “Once it goes up far enough, we can’t avoid it anymore. A higher-up sees it on their dashboard and comes to the site to talk about what’s pending. You can’t just leave it alone.”

That visibility is what creates accountability. The asset values in fleet operations reinforce it, since a single vehicle represents tens of thousands of dollars, which means issues get escalated quickly rather than ignored. But the principle held in the warehouse and the restaurant too, where the same upward visibility kept problems from falling through the cracks.

Urgency, in Ilioaei’s experience, is not something that’s simply layered on top of the work. “Urgency is woven into the operation. It’s knowing that things will pop up at any moment.”

Strong SOPs and steady leadership carry the team

Pressed on what other teams could take from how her operations run, Ilioaei lands on a short list: strong standard operating procedures, a functioning escalation chain, genuine care for the customer and for direct reports, and leaders who model operational discipline. The last one she credits for her own fast start in fleet operations. “I’m lucky to have a good boss and a supportive operations manager. My onboarding was smooth because they were always on top of everything, and they modeled what it means to be good at operations in this industry. That’s what helped me hit the ground running.”

The throughline is that consistency in fast-moving environments is built, not improvised. The habits formed in the slow stretches, the procedures proven over time, and the escalation paths that turn problems into action are what let a frontline team hold steady when there’s no time to pause and figure it out from scratch.

Related articles

In the slow periods, that’s when you focus on process improvement. You tighten things up, you build good habits, and these habits carry you into the busy period.

Laura Ilioaei

Avis Budget Group

Operations Manager

In the slow periods, that's when you focus on process improvement. You tighten things up, you build good habits, and these habits carry you into the busy period.
Laura Ilioaei
Avis Budget Group

Operations Manager

The most reliable operations aren’t defined by the newest tools or the most ambitious process-improvement initiatives. They run on strong standard operating procedures, clear escalation chains, and leaders who model what good execution looks like. In frontline environments where the pace never really slows, the work of improvement must happen during the quieter stretches so it can be executed under pressure during the busy ones. This means the teams that hold up best are the ones that built good habits when they had time to think rather than scrambling to invent them mid-rush.

Laura Ilioaei understands that rhythm intimately. As an Operations Manager at Avis Budget Group overseeing fleet operations at Sarasota Airport, Ilioaei built her management playbook directly on the floor. Her career has spanned frontline, fast-paced environments, including warehouse operations, helping launch a restaurant, and now fleet operations in the car rental industry. Across all three, she has managed teams under the kind of real-time pressure where a single dropped ball can cascade into an operational problem, which shapes her view of when and how improvement work actually gets done.

“In the slow periods, that’s when you focus on process improvement. You check what might have gotten lost in the busy period. You tighten things up, you build good habits, and these habits carry you into the busy period,” she says. Such a rhythm reframes process improvement as something you invest in deliberately, and places the emphasis on the systems and chain of command that keep problems from slipping through rather than on tools that promise to fix execution from the outside.

Slow periods sharpen, busy periods execute

The distinction Ilioaei draws is between two fundamentally different modes of operating. Slow periods are for reflection and refinement. Busy periods are for execution and real-time problem-solving, with no room to step back and redesign anything. “If you try to focus on that during a rush, you’ve created a real-time bottleneck. Why were you focused on process improvement when there was a fire to put out?”

The line between what can wait and what cannot comes down to whether an issue creates an immediate barrier to the operation. Some problems have to be solved the moment they appear because letting them sit creates cascading damage. “If an associate assigns the wrong vehicle to a customer, that’s an inventory nightmare you have to tackle in real time, because there’s a mismatch between what’s on the contract and what they actually have,” Ilioaei explains. 

The same logic applies to staffing gaps during peak demand, like being short-handed at the counter during the noon rush, and to quality problems from third parties, like vehicles arriving too dirty to rent. Those get addressed immediately because they directly block the operation. The deeper process questions wait for the slow season.

Improvement is usually execution, not redesign

One of the more useful distinctions Ilioaei makes is that strong SOPs change what improvement work actually involves. When the underlying procedures are sound, improvement is rarely about overhauling the process. Instead, it’s about tightening how consistently the team executes it. “Process improvement, in my opinion, is more about making sure the end result is what’s best for the customer,” she notes.

That framing depends on having strong procedures in the first place. Ilioaei credits well-established SOPs, proven out with third parties, counter agents, and return agents, for keeping most situations from escalating into serious operational issues. The fires that do happen tend to be the unavoidable kind, like a customer booking one vehicle class and getting another because the inventory isn’t there, rather than failures of the underlying system.

She’s also candid that middle managers operate within limits. Some problems sit above their level of access or authority, and part of operating well is recognizing which problems are yours to solve and which belong to someone higher up the chain.

Escalation chains keep problems from becoming noise

The mechanism Ilioaei keeps returning to, across all three industries she’s worked in, is the escalation chain. It’s what prevents issues from accumulating quietly until they become unmanageable. When a problem moves up the chain of command, it generates the urgency that forces action. “Once it goes up far enough, we can’t avoid it anymore. A higher-up sees it on their dashboard and comes to the site to talk about what’s pending. You can’t just leave it alone.”

That visibility is what creates accountability. The asset values in fleet operations reinforce it, since a single vehicle represents tens of thousands of dollars, which means issues get escalated quickly rather than ignored. But the principle held in the warehouse and the restaurant too, where the same upward visibility kept problems from falling through the cracks.

Urgency, in Ilioaei’s experience, is not something that’s simply layered on top of the work. “Urgency is woven into the operation. It’s knowing that things will pop up at any moment.”

Strong SOPs and steady leadership carry the team

Pressed on what other teams could take from how her operations run, Ilioaei lands on a short list: strong standard operating procedures, a functioning escalation chain, genuine care for the customer and for direct reports, and leaders who model operational discipline. The last one she credits for her own fast start in fleet operations. “I’m lucky to have a good boss and a supportive operations manager. My onboarding was smooth because they were always on top of everything, and they modeled what it means to be good at operations in this industry. That’s what helped me hit the ground running.”

The throughline is that consistency in fast-moving environments is built, not improvised. The habits formed in the slow stretches, the procedures proven over time, and the escalation paths that turn problems into action are what let a frontline team hold steady when there’s no time to pause and figure it out from scratch.