How An IT Lens Transforms HR From Rule Enforcers To Solution Brokers
HR was often seen as the “necessary evil,” a place employees avoided. That’s changed. There’s now a more energized side to HR—one that serves both the organization and the people within it.
Ryan Herrera
HR Information Systems Coordinator
Non-Profit
Human resources is slowly shedding its reputation as the corporate police. The new HR is more practical, acting as a broker between staff and executives—building clear pathways to hear what employees want, and then putting realistic, actionable options on the CEO’s desk. But to fully realize this new potential, professionals need to make an intentional effort to shift employee perception.
As the HR Information Systems Coordinator of a mission-driven child welfare nonprofit, Ryan Herrera brings an untraditional IT and analytics lens to the profession. He builds straightforward channels for staff to share what is and isn’t working. He then packages that data so leadership can see issues that might otherwise stay buried.
“HR was often seen as the ‘necessary evil,’ a place employees avoided. That’s changed. There’s now a more energized side to HR—one that serves both the organization and the people within it,” says Herrera. Employees have historically viewed the department as an enforcement arm, but Herrera moves past that image by giving people direct ways to speak up. One of his main tools is an employee engagement committee. It gives staff a clear route to raise concerns, bypassing the usual game of organizational telephone.
Pitching, not passing: Making those channels work requires genuine trust. It goes beyond a passive open-door policy. Leaders have to create an environment of transparency where people actually feel safe walking through that door. Once that raw data is gathered, HR teams often find themselves needing to translate it into something executives can use. Herrera says his team often has to step in with specific options when sharing hard truths with executives. “It’s more like being solution-oriented rather than passing along the problem,” he says. The job is to turn employee feedback into action by presenting complaints alongside concrete paths forward.
Radical reality checks: Gathering feedback inevitably surfaces ambitious requests that are hard to fund, like adding more paid holidays. Denying those requests causes friction. To keep trust intact, Herrera relies on radical honesty. He lays out the financial and operational realities plainly on the table to manage expectations. “Navigating difficult conversations doesn’t get easier,” Herrera says. He advises leaders to be honest and “lay it all down in front of the employee and in front of the supervisor,” explaining what solutions they can provide and what they can’t.
Even when the answer to a big ask is “no,” HR can still find workable wins. To keep morale up on an operational budget, his team leans on sustainable, low-lift programs. That includes a weekly drawing where an employee wins a small gift card, layered on top of an existing monthly recognition program. These frequent, targeted efforts offer better ways to recognize employees and make a meaningful difference without disrupting budgets. Understanding an employee’s situation makes it easier to deliver a hard “no” respectfully. But empathy has to be balanced with operational boundaries.
Grace and goals: Empathy cannot supersede the bottom line. “At the end of the day, you have to meet the organization’s goals,” he says, adding that “the employee still needs to meet expectations as well.”
From hire to retire: Because every industry has different survival metrics, HR strategies are never one-size-fits-all. Leaders have to turn their specific organizational vision into results. That custom approach requires continuous involvement across the entire employee lifecycle. Instead of appearing only when there is a form to sign, HR sees the cumulative arc of someone’s time with the company. It is a reality that shatters the “check the box” stereotype of administrative paper-pushing. “We see the employee from when they’re being onboarded until the day they put in their resignation or get terminated,” Herrera says. “We’re there for the entire process of the employee’s tenure.”
It’s not uncommon for newcomers to enter the field expecting routine paperwork, only to be surprised by how messy the job gets. HR is still grounded in policies, but more often, it comes down to making judgment calls and brokering solutions. For Herrera, that lack of a set process is exactly what makes the career so rewarding. “HR is ever-growing,” he concludes. “Things change daily. Laws change daily. Industries change daily.” He notes that each issue requires a fresh look, and “there’s never a set process for everything.”
Related articles
TL;DR
HR is shedding its old skin as the corporate enforcer and taking on a more energized and strategic role, but more work is to be done to shift employee perception.
Ryan Herrera, an HR Information Systems Coordinator for a non-profit, uses employee engagement committees and direct feedback channels to surface concerns and radical honesty to build trust.
HR’s shift from enforcement arm to strategic broker depends on continuous involvement across the full employee lifecycle, not just showing up when there’s a form to sign.
Ryan Herrera
Non-Profit
HR Information Systems Coordinator
HR Information Systems Coordinator
Human resources is slowly shedding its reputation as the corporate police. The new HR is more practical, acting as a broker between staff and executives—building clear pathways to hear what employees want, and then putting realistic, actionable options on the CEO’s desk. But to fully realize this new potential, professionals need to make an intentional effort to shift employee perception.
As the HR Information Systems Coordinator of a mission-driven child welfare nonprofit, Ryan Herrera brings an untraditional IT and analytics lens to the profession. He builds straightforward channels for staff to share what is and isn’t working. He then packages that data so leadership can see issues that might otherwise stay buried.
“HR was often seen as the ‘necessary evil,’ a place employees avoided. That’s changed. There’s now a more energized side to HR—one that serves both the organization and the people within it,” says Herrera. Employees have historically viewed the department as an enforcement arm, but Herrera moves past that image by giving people direct ways to speak up. One of his main tools is an employee engagement committee. It gives staff a clear route to raise concerns, bypassing the usual game of organizational telephone.
Pitching, not passing: Making those channels work requires genuine trust. It goes beyond a passive open-door policy. Leaders have to create an environment of transparency where people actually feel safe walking through that door. Once that raw data is gathered, HR teams often find themselves needing to translate it into something executives can use. Herrera says his team often has to step in with specific options when sharing hard truths with executives. “It’s more like being solution-oriented rather than passing along the problem,” he says. The job is to turn employee feedback into action by presenting complaints alongside concrete paths forward.
Radical reality checks: Gathering feedback inevitably surfaces ambitious requests that are hard to fund, like adding more paid holidays. Denying those requests causes friction. To keep trust intact, Herrera relies on radical honesty. He lays out the financial and operational realities plainly on the table to manage expectations. “Navigating difficult conversations doesn’t get easier,” Herrera says. He advises leaders to be honest and “lay it all down in front of the employee and in front of the supervisor,” explaining what solutions they can provide and what they can’t.
Even when the answer to a big ask is “no,” HR can still find workable wins. To keep morale up on an operational budget, his team leans on sustainable, low-lift programs. That includes a weekly drawing where an employee wins a small gift card, layered on top of an existing monthly recognition program. These frequent, targeted efforts offer better ways to recognize employees and make a meaningful difference without disrupting budgets. Understanding an employee’s situation makes it easier to deliver a hard “no” respectfully. But empathy has to be balanced with operational boundaries.
Grace and goals: Empathy cannot supersede the bottom line. “At the end of the day, you have to meet the organization’s goals,” he says, adding that “the employee still needs to meet expectations as well.”
From hire to retire: Because every industry has different survival metrics, HR strategies are never one-size-fits-all. Leaders have to turn their specific organizational vision into results. That custom approach requires continuous involvement across the entire employee lifecycle. Instead of appearing only when there is a form to sign, HR sees the cumulative arc of someone’s time with the company. It is a reality that shatters the “check the box” stereotype of administrative paper-pushing. “We see the employee from when they’re being onboarded until the day they put in their resignation or get terminated,” Herrera says. “We’re there for the entire process of the employee’s tenure.”
It’s not uncommon for newcomers to enter the field expecting routine paperwork, only to be surprised by how messy the job gets. HR is still grounded in policies, but more often, it comes down to making judgment calls and brokering solutions. For Herrera, that lack of a set process is exactly what makes the career so rewarding. “HR is ever-growing,” he concludes. “Things change daily. Laws change daily. Industries change daily.” He notes that each issue requires a fresh look, and “there’s never a set process for everything.”